Excerpt from The New York Times News article, By ALAN SCHWARZ
Published: 29 December 2013 09:55 PM, Updated: 29 December 2013 09:55 PM
"Twenty years ago, more than a dozen leaders in child psychiatry received $11 million from the National Institute of Mental Health to study an important question facing families with children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Is the best long-term treatment medication, behavioral therapy or both?
"...widely considered the most influential study ever on ADHD - worry that the results oversold the benefits of drugs, discouraging important home- and school-focused therapy and ultimately distorting the debate over the most effective (and cost-effective) treatments.
"The study was structured to emphasize the reduction of impulsivity and inattention symptoms, for which medication is designed to deliver quick results, several of the researchers said in recent interviews. Less emphasis was placed on improving children's longer-term academic and social skills, which behavioral therapy addresses by teaching children, parents and teachers to create less distracting and more organized learning environments.
"Recent papers have also cast doubt on whether medication's benefits last as long as those from therapy.
"There was lost opportunity to give kids the advantage of both and develop more resources in schools to support the child - that value was dismissed," said Dr. Gene Arnold, a child psychiatrist and professor at Ohio State University and one of the principal researchers on the study, known as the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD.
"Another co-author, Dr. Lily Hechtman of McGill University in Montreal, added: 'I hope it didn't do irreparable damage. The people who pay the price in the end is the kids. That's the biggest tragedy in all of this.'
"ADHD narrowly trails asthma as the most frequent long-term medical diagnosis in children. More than 1 in 7 children in the United States receive a diagnosis of the disorder by the time they turn 18, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. At least 70 percent of those are prescribed stimulant medication like Adderall or Concerta because, despite potential side effects like insomnia and appetite suppression, it can quickly mollify symptoms and can cost an insured family less than $200 a year.
"Comprehensive behavioral (also called psychosocial) therapy is used far less often to treat children with the disorder largely because it is more time-consuming and expensive. Cost-conscious schools have few aides to help teachers assist the expanding population of children with the diagnosis, which in some communities reaches 20 percent of students. Many insurance plans inadequately cover private or group therapy for families, which can cost $1,000 a year or more.
"Medication helps a person be receptive to learning new skills and behaviors," said Ruth Hughes, a psychologist and the chief executive of the advocacy group Children and Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. 'But those skills and behaviors don't magically appear. They have to be taught.'
"Looking back, some study researchers say several factors in the study's design and presentation to the public disguised the performance of psychosocial therapy, which has allowed many doctors, drug companies and schools to discourage its use.
"A subsequent paper by one of those, Keith Conners, a psychologist and professor emeritus at Duke University, showed that using only one all-inclusive measurement - 'treating the child as a whole,' he said - revealed that combination therapy was significantly better than medication alone. Behavioral therapy emerged as a viable alternative to medication as well. But his paper has received little attention.
"When you asked families what they really liked, they liked combined treatment," said Dr. Peter Jensen, who oversaw the study on behalf of the mental health institute. 'They didn't not like medicine, but they valued skill training. What doctors think are the best outcomes and what families think are the best outcomes aren't always the same thing.'
"Using an additional $10 million in government support to follow the children in the study until young adulthood, researchers have seen some of their original conclusions muddied further. Many experts interpret these more recent findings as showing the dissipation of medication's effects; others counter that going off the medication, as many children did, would naturally dampen continuing positive effects.
"Most recently, a paper from the study said flatly that using any treatment 'does not predict functioning six to eight years later,' leaving the study's original question - which treatment does the most good long-term? - largely unanswered.
"My belief based on the science is that symptom reduction is a good thing, but adding skill-building is a better thing," said Stephen Hinshaw, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, and one of the study researchers. 'If you don't provide skills-based training, you're doing the kid a disservice. I wish we had had a fairer test."